This is an expose regarding =$name?> =$lname?> (legally =$maleName?> =$lname?>, but asks to be called =$femName?> =$lname?>).
@@ -70,7 +90,7 @@diff --git a/css/main.css b/css/main.css
index 3fef5d5..e75d069 100644
--- a/css/main.css
+++ b/css/main.css
@@ -99,18 +99,32 @@ html, body {
font-size: 14pt;
}
-footer, header, main {
+footer, header, main, main section {
box-sizing: border-box;
max-width: 1280px;
margin: 0 auto 0 0;
padding: 20px 40px;
}
- header, main {
+ header, main section {
background: #fff;
}
+ header {
+ margin-bottom: 0;
+ padding-bottom: 0;
+ }
+ main section:first-child {
+ margin-top: 0;
+ padding-top: 0;
+ }
main {
+ margin-top: 0;
+ padding: 0;
+ overflow: hidden;
border-bottom-right-radius: 2rem;
}
+ main section {
+ margin-top: 10px;
+ }
footer {
font-size: 0.8rem;
}
@@ -119,6 +133,9 @@ h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
font-family: 'Quattrocento', serif;
font-weight: bold;
}
+ h1 {
+ margin-bottom: 0;
+ }
.construction {
box-sizing: border-box;
@@ -138,6 +155,24 @@ figure, video, figcaption {
border-radius: 1em;
overflow: hidden;
}
+ figure img {
+ max-width: 100%;
+ display: block;
+ width: auto;
+ margin: 0 auto;
+ }
+ figure.left,
+ figure.right {
+ float: right;
+ width: auto;
+ max-width: 512px;
+ }
+ figure.right {
+ margin: 0 0 1rem 1rem;
+ }
+ figure.left {
+ float: left;
+ }
figcaption {
padding: 0 1rem;
font-size: 0.8rem;
@@ -236,12 +271,14 @@ dd {
* `:before` to contain the top-margins of child elements.
*/
+section:after,
.clearfix:before,
.clearfix:after {
content: " "; /* 1 */
display: table; /* 2 */
}
+section:after,
.clearfix:after {
clear: both;
}
diff --git a/img/case/Jonathan-Yaniv-flags-down-YouTube-video-DMCA-abuse.png b/img/case/Jonathan-Yaniv-flags-down-YouTube-video-DMCA-abuse.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..15fa983
Binary files /dev/null and b/img/case/Jonathan-Yaniv-flags-down-YouTube-video-DMCA-abuse.png differ
diff --git a/img/case/Yaniv-with-biz-Twitter-Cofounder.png b/img/case/Yaniv-with-biz-Twitter-Cofounder.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7ab3a11
Binary files /dev/null and b/img/case/Yaniv-with-biz-Twitter-Cofounder.png differ
diff --git a/index.php b/index.php
index 30dda95..2b3d2c5 100644
--- a/index.php
+++ b/index.php
@@ -10,6 +10,23 @@
$reflex = ($male ? "him" : "her");
$self = "{$reflex}self";
+ function he($ucase = false) {
+ global $pro;
+ return ($ucase ? ucfirst($pro) : $pro);
+ }
+ function his($ucase = false) {
+ global $pos;
+ return ($ucase ? ucfirst($pos) : $pos);
+ }
+ function him($ucase = false) {
+ global $reflex;
+ return ($ucase ? ucfirst($reflex) : $reflex);
+ }
+ function himself($ucase = false) {
+ global $self;
+ return ($ucase ? ucfirst($self) : $self);
+ }
+
$cites = [
[
'title' => "When one person’s right is another’s obligation",
@@ -18,7 +35,11 @@
[
'title' => "Why I Am Permanently Banned From Twitter And Why This Should Make You Worry",
'url' => "https://mirandayardley.com/en/i-permanently-banned-twitter-make-worry/",
- ]
+ ],
+ [
+ 'title' => ""Ah! I miss you @biz!!"",
+ 'url' => "https://archive.fo/4h4SL",
+ ],
];
function cite($index) {
$citeNum = $index+1;
@@ -47,12 +68,11 @@
This is an expose regarding =$name?> =$lname?> (legally =$maleName?> =$lname?>, but asks to be called =$femName?> =$lname?>).
=$name?> =$lname?> is a Sexual Predator
-
The initial incident with =$lname?> started when =$pro?> attempted to find an aesthetician willing to do work on =$pos?> genital region. =$lname?> had problems doing this because =$pro?> insisted on contacting women who specialized in Brazilian waxes. @@ -107,6 +127,62 @@
+ + =$name?> =$lname?> with Twitter co-founder @biz (Biz Stone). + =$name?> likes to boast about =$pos?> connections in the IT industry and the benefits it gives =$reflex?>.=cite(2)?> +
+ The most baffling aspect of the #WaxMyBalls backlash was how it was killed. + It didn't die a peaceful death. + Twitter and YouTube forcefully came down on anyone (anyone!) who mentioned Yaniv. + This ranges from random women and activists with no following, to significant players like Miranda Yardley with high visibility on the platform. +
++ =$name?> =$lname?> works IT and runs their own tech blog called "Trusted Nerd" at trustednerd.com, and is noted for going to many tech conventions out of Canada. + =he(1)?> openly brags about =his()?> connections to the IT industry, such as meeting the co-founder of Twitter in person. + No one has been able to bring up other stories of Twitter protecting an individual so hard, especially against respected feminists, which makes it seem likely nepotism is to blame. +
++ The behavior of Twitter's ban system is also suspect. + While people usually get temporary bans that are based in obvious infactions of the rules, Twitter's protection of =$name?> is the opposite. + Random messages referencing =$lname?> get flagged intermittently, sometimes appeals are acceped, sometimes rejected, sometimes never answered at all. + This unpredictability hints that it's a manual process sometimes intercepted by employees who don't know =$lname?>. + Twitter can't be reached for comment and even as notable people get banned for talking about =$lname?>, even indirectly, the company stay silent. +
++ This extends outside of Twitter. + =$name?> also polices mentions of =his()?> name on YouTube, and will aggressively DMCA videos to flag them down. + These strikes against the channel limit the features available to the creator and can harm their revenue. + Concesuctive strikes can disable their channel entire. +
++ YouTube them never reviews appeals to these DMCA complaints, allowing them to sit indefinitely on the channel's account. + Normally, YouTube would review appeals within a couple of business days and start down a 10 day timer (as per the legal requirements of th DMCA), + but with anything having to do with =$lname?>, no action is taken and that 10 day timer never starts. +
+
+ + This strike filed by =($male ? $name : "{$lname}'s legal name, as required by the DMCA complaint,")?> against a YouTube channel was done on December 26th, 2018 and appealled immediately after. + The complaint regarded a thumbnail on an upcoming livestream that never started because of the DMCA complaint. + In the weeks following, no one at YouTube has touched it, and the channel remains in a penalized state for the duration. + The 10 day timer in which =$lname?> would be required to make legal action has never started because YouTube is ignoring the appeal. +
++ This is not normal. This doesn't happen to anyone for anyone else. +
+