From 55cfeb20827611d490b36069cc10d62d3b973d22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Enegnei Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 21:56:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Minor edit, removed repetition --- JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md b/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md index 1b278fc..dae0424 100644 --- a/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md +++ b/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md @@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ She ended the statement by asking why "[a highly distorted version of my experie > “This is a situation open to misinterpretation because I do not know what she's thinking,” Tan said. “I'm fully willing to stand up and say that.” -Macrina described the **Gizmodo** and **Daily Dot** articles as "[one misreported story](https://web.archive.org/web/20160801154451/https:/twitter.com/flexlibris/status/741074046536851456)," both of which are still live. Neither Patterson nor Shepard revoked their statements. They both initially made brief comments on the fact that Bähring refuted their version of events. Replying to someone pointing out that she had yet to make any retraction, [Patterson](https://web.archive.org/web/20160731202718/https:/twitter.com/maradydd/status/744633281073778688) said that "[there are some goddamn impatient people on the internet. Response forthcoming, but I have a life and a job](https://archive.is/oioum#selection-6789.1-6789.108)." Shepard characterized the story as "[a minor incident the press inflated](https://archive.is/sStV1#selection-5705.79-5705.114)" and [said she was not a reliable judge](https://web.archive.org/web/20160731200225/https:/twitter.com/puellavulnerata/status/744618405030989826) of the situation. +Macrina described the **Gizmodo** and **Daily Dot** articles as "[one misreported story](https://web.archive.org/web/20160801154451/https:/twitter.com/flexlibris/status/741074046536851456)." Neither Patterson nor Shepard revoked their statements. They both initially made brief comments on the fact that Bähring refuted their version of events. Replying to someone pointing out that she had yet to make any retraction, [Patterson](https://web.archive.org/web/20160731202718/https:/twitter.com/maradydd/status/744633281073778688) said that "[there are some goddamn impatient people on the internet. Response forthcoming, but I have a life and a job](https://archive.is/oioum#selection-6789.1-6789.108)." Shepard characterized the story as "[a minor incident the press inflated](https://archive.is/sStV1#selection-5705.79-5705.114)" and [said she was not a reliable judge](https://web.archive.org/web/20160731200225/https:/twitter.com/puellavulnerata/status/744618405030989826) of the situation. > [Frankly, I can't read neurotypical human interactions well enough to reliably tell if someone's upset or not; I was relying entirely](https://archive.is/sStV1#selection-6053.1-6053.133) [on](https://archive.is/sStV1#selection-6467.4-6477.112) [@Emerson_T's](https://archive.is/nBDWm) [interpretation of events that night, and also had the least clear view of anyone involved, since I was trying](https://archive.is/sStV1#selection-6467.4-6477.112) [to avoid being spotted by him.](https://archive.is/sStV1#selection-6861.4-6861.34) [This argument over what did or did not actually happen that night, though, is entirely orthogonal to the actual allegations against](https://archive.is/sStV1#selection-7211.1-7211.132) [Jake which are the only reason the incident in question ever got any attention in the first place.](https://archive.is/sStV1#selection-7565.4-7565.102) >