Files
JonathanYaniv/index.php
T
2019-01-08 08:14:52 -05:00

212 lines
12 KiB
PHP
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<?php
$male = strpos($_SERVER['SERVER_NAME'], 'jessica') !== false ? false : true;
$femName = "Jessica";
$maleName = "Jonathan";
$lname = "Yaniv";
$name = ($male ? $maleName : $femName);
$pro = ($male ? "he" : "she");
$pos = ($male ? "his" : "her");
$reflex = ($male ? "him" : "her");
$self = "{$reflex}self";
function he($ucase = false) {
global $pro;
return ($ucase ? ucfirst($pro) : $pro);
}
function his($ucase = false) {
global $pos;
return ($ucase ? ucfirst($pos) : $pos);
}
function him($ucase = false) {
global $reflex;
return ($ucase ? ucfirst($reflex) : $reflex);
}
function himself($ucase = false) {
global $self;
return ($ucase ? ucfirst($self) : $self);
}
$cites = [
[
'title' => "When one persons right is anothers obligation",
'url' => "https://www.economist.com/briefing/2018/10/25/when-one-persons-right-is-anothers-obligation",
],
[
'title' => "Why I Am Permanently Banned From Twitter And Why This Should Make You Worry",
'url' => "https://mirandayardley.com/en/i-permanently-banned-twitter-make-worry/",
],
[
'title' => "&quot;Ah! I miss you @biz!!&quot;",
'url' => "https://archive.fo/4h4SL",
],
];
function cite($index) {
$citeNum = $index+1;
return "<sup class=\"cite\"><a href=\"#cite-link-{$index}\" class=\"cite\">[{$citeNum}]</a></sup>";
}
?><!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="no-js" lang="">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8" />
<meta http-equiv="x-ua-compatible" content="ie=edge" />
<title>PREDATOR: <?=$name?> | <?=$_SERVER['SERVER_NAME']?></title>
<meta name="description" content="" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, shrink-to-fit=no" />
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans|Quattrocento:700" rel="stylesheet">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/normalize.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/ligtbox.min.css" />
<!--<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/main.css" />-->
<style type="text/css">
<?php include('./css/main.css'); ?>
</style>
</head>
<body class="<?=($male ? "safety-off" : "safe-space")?>">
<div class="construction"><span>This webpage is currently in development.</span></div>
<header>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
<h1><?=$name?> <?=$lname?> is a Sexual Predator</h1>
</header>
<main>
<section>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
<p>
This is an expose regarding <?=$name?> <?=$lname?> (legally <?=$maleName?> <?=$lname?>, but asks to be called <?=$femName?> <?=$lname?>).
</p>
<p>
This document is not about transgender issues. It is about an abuser who uses trans issues to protect <?=$self?> from criticism.
Wearing the guise of a marginalized person, <?=$name?> has sued 16 different beauticians for refusing to wax <?=$pos?> penis and testicles.<?=cite(0)?>
Since then, <?=$pro?> has been uncovered by <em>dozens</em> of women as being a sex pest interested in developing girls.
</p>
<p>
Everyone, men and women, trans and cis, who have criticized <?=$lname?> have been subjected to strict censorship, threats of litigation, and deplatforming by YouTube, Twitter, and private web hosts.
This includes well-known transgender feminists like Miranda Yardley.<?=cite(1)?>
</p>
<p>
In the past few months more information has been uncovered exposing him as someone with an unhealthy obsession with coming-of-age girls.
</p>
</section>
<section>
<h2 name="wax-my-balls">"Wax my Balls"</h2>
<p>
The initial incident with <?=$lname?> started when <?=$pro?> attempted to find an aesthetician willing to do work on <?=$pos?> genital region.
<?=$lname?> had problems doing this because <?=$pro?> insisted on contacting women who specialized in Brazilian waxes.
Either out of willful ignorance or malice, <?=$lname?> rejected advice that <?=$pro?> should seek out a general aesthetician who could work on male genitals.
There is a technical distinction between a Brazilian wax for female and male genitals. A specialist who only works with female genitals cannot work with male genitals.
</p>
<p>
Some of the women are claiming <?=$pro?> contacted them via messenger and telephone for <em>weeks</em> without taking 'no' as an answer!
</p>
<p>
Undeterreted, <?=$name?> <?=$lname?> filed complaints with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal against all 16 female beauticians who refused to service <?=$reflex?>.
This is different from a lawsuit. <?=$name?> claims that the beauticians fundamentally violated <?=$pos?> human rights by not waxing <?=$pos?> balls.
This human rights tribunal also has a second caveat: <?=$name?> <?=$lname?> doesn't need to get a lawyer (solicitor in Canada) to make <?=$pos?> case,
but the beauticians <em>do</em> need to pay for solicitors out of pocket to defend themselves and their careers.
Not only that, but because transgender law is so new and complicated, many solicitors refuse to help because it can hurt their careers as well!
</p>
<p>
Further, <?=$name?> <?=$lname?> filed with the Canadian courts to have publication of <?=$pos?> name <em>legally banned</em>, forcing all Canadian publications to refer to <?=$reflex?> simply as "JY".
It is quite clear that <?=$lname?> knows this behavior is deceitful, destructive, abusive, and generally appalling and would like people to not know what <?=$pro?> is doing.
</p>
<figure class="video">
<video poster="/video/fcqipv.jpg" controls>
<source src="/video/fcqipv.webm" type="video/webm" />
<source src="/video/fcqipv.mp4" type="video/mp4" />
</video>
<figcaption>
<?php if (!$male) : ?>
<p class="tw">
This video features some TERF rhetoric, but she is a primary victim of a censorship campaign.
It is the opinion of this author that censureship is acceptable, but censorship never is.
</p>
<?php endif; ?>
<p>Gender abolitionist feminist <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/Perzikyoghurt">Peachyogurt</a> explains the <?=$name?> <?=$lname?> situation from her point of view.</p>
</figcaption>
</figure>
</section>
<section>
<h2 name="wax-my-balls">Censoring the Fallout</h2>
<figure class="right">
<img src="/img/case/Yaniv-with-biz-Twitter-Cofounder.png" />
<figcaption>
<p>
<?=$name?> <?=$lname?> with Twitter co-founder @biz (Biz Stone).
<?=$name?> likes to boast about <?=$pos?> connections in the IT industry and the benefits it gives <?=$reflex?>.<?=cite(2)?>
</figcaption>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>
The most baffling aspect of the #WaxMyBalls backlash was how it was <em>killed</em>.
It didn't die a peaceful death.
Twitter and YouTube forcefully came down on anyone (<em>anyone!</em>) who mentioned Yaniv.
This ranges from random women and activists with no following, to significant players like Miranda Yardley with high visibility on the platform.
</p>
<p>
<?=$name?> <?=$lname?> works IT and runs their own tech blog called "Trusted Nerd" at trustednerd.com, and is noted for going to many tech conventions out of Canada.
<?=he(1)?> openly brags about <?=his()?> connections to the IT industry, such as meeting the co-founder of Twitter in person.
No one has been able to bring up other stories of Twitter protecting an individual so hard, especially against respected feminists, which makes it seem likely nepotism is to blame.
</p>
<p>
The behavior of Twitter's ban system is also suspect.
While people usually get temporary bans that are based in obvious infactions of the rules, Twitter's protection of <?=$name?> is the opposite.
Random messages referencing <?=$lname?> get flagged intermittently, sometimes appeals are acceped, sometimes rejected, sometimes never answered at all.
This unpredictability hints that it's a manual process sometimes intercepted by employees who don't know <?=$lname?>.
Twitter can't be reached for comment and even as notable people get banned for talking about <?=$lname?>, even indirectly, the company stays silent.
</p>
<p>
This extends outside of Twitter.
<?=$name?> also polices mentions of <?=his()?> name on YouTube, and will aggressively abuse a copyright law to delete content and penalize creators.
These strikes against YouTube channels limit the features available to the creator and can harm their revenue.
Concesuctive strikes can disable their channel entirely.
</p>
<p>
YouTube then never reviews appeals to these DMCA complaints, allowing the appeal to sit indefinitely on the channel's account instead of being forwarded to the complaintant.
Normally, YouTube would review appeals within a couple of business days and start down a 10 day timer (as per the legal requirements of th DMCA),
but with anything having to do with <?=$lname?>, no action is taken and that 10 day timer never starts, forcing the creator to endure months of penalty status.
</p>
<figure>
<img src="/img/case/Jonathan-Yaniv-flags-down-YouTube-video-DMCA-abuse.png" />
<figcaption>
<p>
This strike filed by <?=($male ? $name : "{$lname}'s legal name, as required by the DMCA complaint,")?> against a YouTube channel was done on December 26th, 2018 and appealled immediately after.
The complaint regarded a thumbnail on an upcoming livestream that never started because of the DMCA complaint.
In the weeks following, no one at YouTube has touched it, and the channel remains in a penalized state for the duration.
The 10 day timer in which <?=$lname?> would be required to make legal action has never started because YouTube is ignoring the appeal.
</p>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>
This is not normal. This doesn't happen to anyone for anyone else.
</p>
</section>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</main>
<footer>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
<section>
<h2>Citations</h2>
<dl class="cites">
<?php foreach($cites as $i => $cite) { ?>
<dt><?=($i+1)?>.</dt>
<dd name="cite-link-<?=($i+1)?>"><?="<a href=\"{$cites[$i]['url']}\"><em>{$cites[$i]['title']}</a></em>"?></dd>
<?php } ?>
</dl>
</section>
<p class="copyright"><img src="/img/cc0.png" /> No rights reserved. You may save, store, transmit, duplicate, edit, publish, or monetize this document in any way that pleases you.</p>
<p class="maintainer">This document is maintained by Joshua Moon <tt>&lt;<a href="mailto:josh@jaw.sh">josh@jaw.sh</a>&gt;</tt>. Submit comments, complaints and litigation to that address. Yes, that means you Jonathan.</p>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</footer>
<script src="js/vendor/modernizr-3.6.0.min.js"></script>
<script src="js/vendor/lightbox.min.js"></script>
<script src="js/plugins.js"></script>
<script src="js/main.js"></script>
</body>
</html>