Spelling.

index.php

@@ -155,18 +155,18 @@
                 While people usually get temporary bans that are based in obvious infactions of the rules, Twitter's protection of <?=$name?> is the opposite.
                 Random messages referencing <?=$lname?> get flagged intermittently, sometimes appeals are acceped, sometimes rejected, sometimes never answered at all.
                 This unpredictability hints that it's a manual process sometimes intercepted by employees who don't know <?=$lname?>.
-                Twitter can't be reached for comment and even as notable people get banned for talking about <?=$lname?>, even indirectly, the company stay silent.
+                Twitter can't be reached for comment and even as notable people get banned for talking about <?=$lname?>, even indirectly, the company stays silent.
             </p>
             <p>
                 This extends outside of Twitter.
-                <?=$name?> also polices mentions of <?=his()?> name on YouTube, and will aggressively DMCA videos to flag them down.
-                These strikes against the channel limit the features available to the creator and can harm their revenue.
-                Concesuctive strikes can disable their channel entire.
+                <?=$name?> also polices mentions of <?=his()?> name on YouTube, and will aggressively abuse a copyright law to delete content and penalize creators.
+                These strikes against YouTube channels limit the features available to the creator and can harm their revenue.
+                Concesuctive strikes can disable their channel entirely.
             </p>
             <p>
-                YouTube them never reviews appeals to these DMCA complaints, allowing them to sit indefinitely on the channel's account.
+                YouTube then never reviews appeals to these DMCA complaints, allowing the appeal to sit indefinitely on the channel's account instead of being forwarded to the complaintant.
                 Normally, YouTube would review appeals within a couple of business days and start down a 10 day timer (as per the legal requirements of th DMCA),
-                but with anything having to do with <?=$lname?>, no action is taken and that 10 day timer never starts.
+                but with anything having to do with <?=$lname?>, no action is taken and that 10 day timer never starts, forcing the creator to endure months of penalty status.
             </p>
             <figure>
                 <img src="/img/case/Jonathan-Yaniv-flags-down-YouTube-video-DMCA-abuse.png" />