Censorship section.

This commit is contained in:
2019-01-08 08:11:00 -05:00
parent 7f12b1695a
commit 39fdbdea70
4 changed files with 119 additions and 6 deletions
+39 -2
View File
@@ -99,18 +99,32 @@ html, body {
font-size: 14pt;
}
footer, header, main {
footer, header, main, main section {
box-sizing: border-box;
max-width: 1280px;
margin: 0 auto 0 0;
padding: 20px 40px;
}
header, main {
header, main section {
background: #fff;
}
header {
margin-bottom: 0;
padding-bottom: 0;
}
main section:first-child {
margin-top: 0;
padding-top: 0;
}
main {
margin-top: 0;
padding: 0;
overflow: hidden;
border-bottom-right-radius: 2rem;
}
main section {
margin-top: 10px;
}
footer {
font-size: 0.8rem;
}
@@ -119,6 +133,9 @@ h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {
font-family: 'Quattrocento', serif;
font-weight: bold;
}
h1 {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
.construction {
box-sizing: border-box;
@@ -138,6 +155,24 @@ figure, video, figcaption {
border-radius: 1em;
overflow: hidden;
}
figure img {
max-width: 100%;
display: block;
width: auto;
margin: 0 auto;
}
figure.left,
figure.right {
float: right;
width: auto;
max-width: 512px;
}
figure.right {
margin: 0 0 1rem 1rem;
}
figure.left {
float: left;
}
figcaption {
padding: 0 1rem;
font-size: 0.8rem;
@@ -236,12 +271,14 @@ dd {
* `:before` to contain the top-margins of child elements.
*/
section:after,
.clearfix:before,
.clearfix:after {
content: " "; /* 1 */
display: table; /* 2 */
}
section:after,
.clearfix:after {
clear: both;
}
Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 41 KiB

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 45 KiB

+80 -4
View File
@@ -10,6 +10,23 @@
$reflex = ($male ? "him" : "her");
$self = "{$reflex}self";
function he($ucase = false) {
global $pro;
return ($ucase ? ucfirst($pro) : $pro);
}
function his($ucase = false) {
global $pos;
return ($ucase ? ucfirst($pos) : $pos);
}
function him($ucase = false) {
global $reflex;
return ($ucase ? ucfirst($reflex) : $reflex);
}
function himself($ucase = false) {
global $self;
return ($ucase ? ucfirst($self) : $self);
}
$cites = [
[
'title' => "When one persons right is anothers obligation",
@@ -18,7 +35,11 @@
[
'title' => "Why I Am Permanently Banned From Twitter And Why This Should Make You Worry",
'url' => "https://mirandayardley.com/en/i-permanently-banned-twitter-make-worry/",
]
],
[
'title' => ""Ah! I miss you @biz!!"",
'url' => "https://archive.fo/4h4SL",
],
];
function cite($index) {
$citeNum = $index+1;
@@ -47,12 +68,11 @@
<header>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
<h1><?=$name?> <?=$lname?> is a Sexual Predator</h1>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</header>
<main>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
<section>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
<p>
This is an expose regarding <?=$name?> <?=$lname?> (legally <?=$maleName?> <?=$lname?>, but asks to be called <?=$femName?> <?=$lname?>).
</p>
@@ -70,7 +90,7 @@
</p>
</section>
<section>
<h2>"Wax my Balls"</h2>
<h2 name="wax-my-balls">"Wax my Balls"</h2>
<p>
The initial incident with <?=$lname?> started when <?=$pro?> attempted to find an aesthetician willing to do work on <?=$pos?> genital region.
<?=$lname?> had problems doing this because <?=$pro?> insisted on contacting women who specialized in Brazilian waxes.
@@ -107,6 +127,62 @@
</figcaption>
</figure>
</section>
<section>
<h2 name="wax-my-balls">Censoring the Fallout</h2>
<figure class="right">
<img src="/img/case/Yaniv-with-biz-Twitter-Cofounder.png" />
<figcaption>
<p>
<?=$name?> <?=$lname?> with Twitter co-founder @biz (Biz Stone).
<?=$name?> likes to boast about <?=$pos?> connections in the IT industry and the benefits it gives <?=$reflex?>.<?=cite(2)?>
</figcaption>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>
The most baffling aspect of the #WaxMyBalls backlash was how it was <em>killed</em>.
It didn't die a peaceful death.
Twitter and YouTube forcefully came down on anyone (<em>anyone!</em>) who mentioned Yaniv.
This ranges from random women and activists with no following, to significant players like Miranda Yardley with high visibility on the platform.
</p>
<p>
<?=$name?> <?=$lname?> works IT and runs their own tech blog called "Trusted Nerd" at trustednerd.com, and is noted for going to many tech conventions out of Canada.
<?=he(1)?> openly brags about <?=his()?> connections to the IT industry, such as meeting the co-founder of Twitter in person.
No one has been able to bring up other stories of Twitter protecting an individual so hard, especially against respected feminists, which makes it seem likely nepotism is to blame.
</p>
<p>
The behavior of Twitter's ban system is also suspect.
While people usually get temporary bans that are based in obvious infactions of the rules, Twitter's protection of <?=$name?> is the opposite.
Random messages referencing <?=$lname?> get flagged intermittently, sometimes appeals are acceped, sometimes rejected, sometimes never answered at all.
This unpredictability hints that it's a manual process sometimes intercepted by employees who don't know <?=$lname?>.
Twitter can't be reached for comment and even as notable people get banned for talking about <?=$lname?>, even indirectly, the company stay silent.
</p>
<p>
This extends outside of Twitter.
<?=$name?> also polices mentions of <?=his()?> name on YouTube, and will aggressively DMCA videos to flag them down.
These strikes against the channel limit the features available to the creator and can harm their revenue.
Concesuctive strikes can disable their channel entire.
</p>
<p>
YouTube them never reviews appeals to these DMCA complaints, allowing them to sit indefinitely on the channel's account.
Normally, YouTube would review appeals within a couple of business days and start down a 10 day timer (as per the legal requirements of th DMCA),
but with anything having to do with <?=$lname?>, no action is taken and that 10 day timer never starts.
</p>
<figure>
<img src="/img/case/Jonathan-Yaniv-flags-down-YouTube-video-DMCA-abuse.png" />
<figcaption>
<p>
This strike filed by <?=($male ? $name : "{$lname}'s legal name, as required by the DMCA complaint,")?> against a YouTube channel was done on December 26th, 2018 and appealled immediately after.
The complaint regarded a thumbnail on an upcoming livestream that never started because of the DMCA complaint.
In the weeks following, no one at YouTube has touched it, and the channel remains in a penalized state for the duration.
The 10 day timer in which <?=$lname?> would be required to make legal action has never started because YouTube is ignoring the appeal.
</p>
</figcaption>
</figure>
<p>
This is not normal. This doesn't happen to anyone for anyone else.
</p>
</section>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
</main>