CrunkLord420/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Enegnei/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor synced 2026-05-26 15:02:54 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Noted article update

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Enegnei
2020-07-03 08:01:40 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 3401832420
commit 879b876788
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ He also claimed to have knowledge about Todd's lawyers' views of their client: "
[Wilcox](https://archive.is/dP51d) published [a Medium post](https://archive.is/rlvLT) that focused on Jane Doe's allegations and [his declaration](https://web.archive.org/web/20190716120922/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.2.pdf), concluding "I don’t want to give anyone an opportunity to sow confusion by changing the topic to be about me." Yet he neglected to mention that, prior to settlement, the court had [already decided](https://web.archive.org/web/20200108143447/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.53.0.pdf) to not focus on the allegations from / about third parties; in that vein, Wilcox's declaration was to be "excluded as inadmissible hearsay. The non-hearsay portions of the declaration are unnecessary for the court’s analysis." In footnotes, Appelbaum's [declaration](https://web.archive.org/web/20190730004551/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.25.0.pdf) was similarly deemed "not relevant to this motion."
In their coverage of the case settlement, [**CoinDesk**](https://archive.is/ZLGGD) falsely reported that "two Jane Does made filings in the case." While Lovecruft [claimed](https://web.archive.org/web/20200616173508/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.3.pdf) to have spoken to two women, [only one filed a declaration](https://web.archive.org/web/20190716122811/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.4.pdf) with the court. **CoinDesk** also states that "Todd denied both charges," when there were no charges to begin with, as this was a civil lawsuit.
In their coverage of the case settlement, [**CoinDesk**](https://archive.is/ZLGGD) falsely reported that "two Jane Does made filings in the case." While Lovecruft [claimed](https://web.archive.org/web/20200616173508/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.3.pdf) to have spoken to two women, [only one filed a declaration](https://web.archive.org/web/20190716122811/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.4.pdf) with the court. **CoinDesk** also stated that "Todd denied both charges," when there were no charges to begin with, as this was a civil lawsuit. While they subsequently fixed these errors, Todd says the article "[also misquotes me, which Coindesk has refused to fix](https://archive.is/RPsvT)."
Less than [one day](https://archive.is/9lEwH) after the settlement was publicy announced, [Lovecruft](https://archive.vn/veQFy) [tweeted](http://archive.is/JzQjI):