CrunkLord420/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Enegnei/JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor synced 2026-05-26 15:02:54 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

Added CoinDesk and Wilcox posts /2

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Enegnei
2020-06-17 01:42:19 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent f4461add16
commit 8f10029eff
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
JacobAppelbaumLeavesTor.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1598,4 +1598,4 @@ On or around June 15th, Lovecruft tweeted, "[While Peter Todd and I were involve
Todd [confirmed](https://archive.is/FcI1Y) that this "ridiculously expensive" lawsuit had been [settled](https://archive.is/kxWjf) and shared [the](https://archive.is/bis0D) [pages](https://archive.vn/xcmfc) [of](https://archive.vn/ZEWCh) [the](https://archive.vn/95yJd) [agreement](https://archive.vn/08OuX). He noted that he would be "checking with my lawyers about what I can say about it and the evidence we got in discovery. No NDA, so should be able to do a full writeup."
In their coverage of the case settlement, [**CoinDesk**](https://archive.is/ZLGGD) falsely reported that "two Jane Does made filings in the case." While Lovecruft [claimed](https://web.archive.org/web/20200616173508/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.3.pdf) to have spoken to two women, only one filed a declaration with the court. **CoinDesk** also states that "Todd denied both charges," when there were no charges, as this was a civil lawsuit. Wilcox also published [a Medium post](https://archive.is/rlvLT) with Jane Doe's allegations and [his declaration](https://web.archive.org/web/20190716120922/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.2.pdf). He neglected to mention that, prior to settlement, the court had [already decided to not focus on allegations from third parties](https://web.archive.org/web/20200108143447/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.53.0.pdf); Wilcox's declaration was "[excluded as inadmissible hearsay. The non-hearsay portions of the declaration are unnecessary for the court’s analysis](https://web.archive.org/web/20200108143447/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.53.0.pdf)."
In their coverage of the case settlement, [**CoinDesk**](https://archive.is/ZLGGD) falsely reported that "two Jane Does made filings in the case." While Lovecruft [claimed](https://web.archive.org/web/20200616173508/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.3.pdf) to have spoken to two women, only one filed a declaration with the court. **CoinDesk** also states that "Todd denied both charges," when there were no charges, as this was a civil lawsuit. Wilcox published [a Medium post](https://archive.is/rlvLT) that focused on Jane Doe's allegations and [his declaration](https://web.archive.org/web/20190716120922/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.20.2.pdf), noting that "I don’t want to give anyone an opportunity to sow confusion by changing the topic to be about me." Yet he neglected to mention that, prior to settlement, the court had [already decided to not focus on allegations from third parties](https://web.archive.org/web/20200108143447/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.340308/gov.uscourts.cand.340308.53.0.pdf); in that vein, Wilcox's declaration was to be "excluded as inadmissible hearsay. The non-hearsay portions of the declaration are unnecessary for the court’s analysis."